Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Tag Information for Catalog Items #1357

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2017

Conversation

jzigmund
Copy link

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented May 16, 2017

Checked commit jzigmund@a03795e with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

@h-kataria
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good.

@h-kataria h-kataria added this to the Sprint 61 Ending May 22, 2017 milestone May 16, 2017
@h-kataria h-kataria merged commit 8e82d52 into ManageIQ:master May 16, 2017
@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

Euwe backport (to manageiq repo) details:

$ git log -1
commit d50339701c47e492c7b3f66d2abd0e68d8f6c35e
Author: Harpreet Kataria <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue May 16 13:53:50 2017 -0400

    Merge pull request #1357 from jzigmund/bz1435918-tags_on_catalog_items
    
    Add Tag Information for Catalog Items
    (cherry picked from commit 8e82d52f486f770a2bbf69d8f8cdc3ff118f5414)
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454442

@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

simaishi commented Jun 8, 2017

Fine backport details:

$ git log -1
commit 38d82469cf58de395ae180e30a769c7e39dce805
Author: Harpreet Kataria <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue May 16 13:53:50 2017 -0400

    Merge pull request #1357 from jzigmund/bz1435918-tags_on_catalog_items
    
    Add Tag Information for Catalog Items
    (cherry picked from commit 8e82d52f486f770a2bbf69d8f8cdc3ff118f5414)
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459944

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants