Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Omit rack id field when storing physical server #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2018

Conversation

tadeboro
Copy link
Contributor

Field in question should point to an existing physical rack. At the
moment, Redfish provider does not support adding racks to the
inventory, so this field should be omitted when saving the server.

@miq-bot assign @gtanzillo
/cc @gberginc @matejart

Field in question should point to an existing physical rack. At the
moment, Redfish provider does not support adding racks to the
inventory, so this field should be omitted when saving the server.
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jun 14, 2018

Checked commit xlab-si@2855182 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. ⭐

Copy link
Contributor

@gberginc gberginc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@agrare agrare assigned agrare and unassigned gtanzillo Jun 16, 2018
@agrare agrare merged commit 2855182 into ManageIQ:master Jun 16, 2018
agrare added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2018
Omit rack id field when storing physical server
@agrare agrare added this to the Sprint 88 Ending Jun 18, 2018 milestone Jun 16, 2018
@agrare agrare added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 16, 2018
@agrare
Copy link
Member

agrare commented Jun 16, 2018

Looks like we could use some better spec tests 😄

@tadeboro tadeboro deleted the remove-rack-id-from-server branch July 11, 2018 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants