Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add StorageManager modules to fix CinderManager import paths #352

Merged

Conversation

mansam
Copy link
Contributor

@mansam mansam commented Sep 11, 2018

One of the recent inventory refactor PRs moved the location of the CinderManager inventory modules, which causes problems in the console and in other situations because the require_nested :CinderManager calls don't work. This adds modules to fix the import path and updates the require_nested call.

@mansam mansam force-pushed the fix-cindermanager-inventory-import-path branch from c1fc461 to a4f1517 Compare September 11, 2018 21:38
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Sep 11, 2018

Checked commit mansam@a4f1517 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
6 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🍰

@Ladas
Copy link
Contributor

Ladas commented Sep 12, 2018

@mansam looks like a core is failing, let me try to fix that

@Ladas
Copy link
Contributor

Ladas commented Sep 12, 2018

hm, ok, the failure is used by a virtual column ManageIQ/manageiq#17975, we'll need to fix that

Copy link
Contributor

@Ladas Ladas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks great 👍

@aufi
Copy link
Member

aufi commented Sep 13, 2018

Looks good to me, merging 👍

@aufi aufi merged commit c6b66fa into ManageIQ:master Sep 13, 2018
@aufi aufi added the bug label Sep 13, 2018
@aufi aufi added this to the Sprint 95 Ending Sep 24, 2018 milestone Sep 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants