Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to retire a service from service dialog #206

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

psachin
Copy link
Contributor

@psachin psachin commented Oct 26, 2017

As per[1] we can retire a service but including 'service_retire_on' in
service dialog still needs customization in Automate. This is
discussed in [2].

I think ManageIQ Domain should handle 'service_retire_on' dialog
option by default. This will save creating a custom domain just to
fetch 'service_retire_on' value from service catalog.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300428
[2] http://talk.manageiq.org/t/services-retirement-date/786/2

Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506712

@gmcculloug gmcculloug self-assigned this Oct 26, 2017
As per[1] we can retire a service but including 'service_retire_on' in
service dialog still needs customization in Automate. This is
discussed in [2].

I think ManageIQ Domain should handle 'service_retire_on' dialog
option by default. This will save creating a custom domain just to
fetch 'service_retire_on' value from service catalog.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300428
[2] http://talk.manageiq.org/t/services-retirement-date/786/2

Closes-Bug: BZ#1506712
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Oct 27, 2017

Checked commit psachin@5230b31 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🍪

@gmcculloug
Copy link
Member

Closing in favor of PR ManageIQ/manageiq#16799

@gmcculloug gmcculloug closed this Jan 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants