Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 7, 2022. It is now read-only.

[1LP][RFR] Fix for test_service_rbac #9999

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2020

Conversation

Gauravtalreja1
Copy link
Contributor

@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 commented Mar 19, 2020

Purpose or Intent

PRT Run

{{pytest: cfme/tests/services/test_service_rbac.py --long-running }}

@dajoRH dajoRH added lint-ok and removed needs-lint labels Mar 20, 2020
@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 force-pushed the fix-rbac-service branch 7 times, most recently from bef914b to 3f3ead7 Compare March 26, 2020 09:31
@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 changed the title [WIPTEST] Fix for test_service_rbac [RFR] Fix for test_service_rbac.py Mar 26, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@jarovo jarovo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found no problem with this PR, but I think others would like you to use delete_if_exists

Copy link
Contributor

@john-dupuy john-dupuy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some small changes about using delete_if_exists, otherwise LGTM

@john-dupuy john-dupuy changed the title [RFR] Fix for test_service_rbac.py [WIPTEST] Fix for test_service_rbac.py Mar 26, 2020
@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 changed the title [WIPTEST] Fix for test_service_rbac.py [RFR] Fix for test_service_rbac Mar 26, 2020
@john-dupuy john-dupuy changed the title [RFR] Fix for test_service_rbac [1LP][RFR] Fix for test_service_rbac Mar 26, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@digitronik digitronik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice PR 👍
Thanks for fix... one question take a look.

@digitronik digitronik merged commit 80b03c5 into ManageIQ:master Mar 27, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants