Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 7, 2022. It is now read-only.

[1LP][RFR] Automating default non required value drop dialog #10011

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2020

Conversation

niyazRedhat
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose or Intent

PRT Run

{{pytest: cfme/tests/services/test_dialog_element_in_catalog.py::test_dialog_not_required_default_value }}

@dajoRH dajoRH added lint-ok and removed needs-lint labels Mar 24, 2020
@niyazRedhat niyazRedhat changed the title [WIPTEST] Automating default non required value drop dialog [RFR] Automating default non required value drop dialog Mar 24, 2020
service_catalogs = ServiceCatalogs(appliance, catalog_item.catalog, catalog_item.name)

# download yaml file
fs = FTPClientWrapper(cfme_data.ftpserver.entities.dialogs)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Optional:
We can merge line 1159 and 1160 as we are not using more than one time as below:
file_path = FTPClientWrapper(cfme_data.ftpserver.entities.dialogs).download(file_name)

@valaparthvi valaparthvi changed the title [RFR] Automating default non required value drop dialog [1LP][RFR] Automating default non required value drop dialog Mar 24, 2020
@dajoRH dajoRH changed the title [1LP][RFR] Automating default non required value drop dialog [1LP][WIP] Automating default non required value drop dialog Mar 24, 2020
@niyazRedhat niyazRedhat changed the title [1LP][WIP] Automating default non required value drop dialog [1LP][WIPTEST] Automating default non required value drop dialog Mar 24, 2020
@niyazRedhat niyazRedhat changed the title [1LP][WIPTEST] Automating default non required value drop dialog [1LP][RFR] Automating default non required value drop dialog Mar 24, 2020
@digitronik digitronik merged commit e126809 into ManageIQ:master Mar 25, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants