Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up iceshelf framework #816

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

xylar
Copy link
Collaborator

@xylar xylar commented Apr 14, 2024

This PR has some clean up needed to make SSH adjustment in the iceshelf framework work for adjusting SSH instead of land-ice pressure.

This was pulled out of #813 because that work no longer uses the iceshelf framework.

Checklist

  • Document (in a comment titled Testing in this PR) any testing that was used to verify the changes

Copy link
Collaborator

@cbegeman cbegeman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these changes look good. You can merge when you're ready. Happy to do testing if you like.

xylar added 2 commits May 2, 2024 17:18
don't use camel case variable names

move some common calculations outside the iterative loop
@xylar xylar force-pushed the clean-up-iceshelf-framework branch from c164f5d to f161a60 Compare May 2, 2024 22:18
@xylar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xylar commented May 5, 2024

I tried testing this on Chrysalis on Friday and was getting unexpected non-BFB results in tests without ice-shelf cavities. I think it may be just the Chrysalis weirdness that we have been experiencing lately. I'm going to wait until #810 has gone in because I'm hoping that will fix the issues.

@xylar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xylar commented May 8, 2024

Testing

I ran the pr suite with these changes, using the current master as a baseline. All tests passed.

@xylar xylar merged commit afec8c0 into MPAS-Dev:main May 8, 2024
4 checks passed
@xylar xylar deleted the clean-up-iceshelf-framework branch May 8, 2024 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants