Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add BQ devices (http://www.bqreaders.com/) #46

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2014
Merged

Conversation

eighthave
Copy link
Contributor

BQ is the manufacturer is planning on shipping an Ubuntu Touch device, which also uses adb and fastboot.

M0Rf30 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2014
@M0Rf30 M0Rf30 merged commit c678791 into M0Rf30:master Oct 22, 2014
@JoesCat
Copy link
Collaborator

JoesCat commented Aug 31, 2023

Hi @eighthave - I was trying to improve 51-android.rules to run a bit quicker, and looking at this patch, I tried to improve it to adbfast based on the symlinks in your patch.
I see that this may be a problem as I run into other documentation that very much appears to suggest this is idProduct value for mtp access (see debian bug 921559 and also libmtp 0c02-mtp and 2008=mtp).

Question, are these values adb, fastboot, or mtp? or maybe a combination of all three?

@eighthave
Copy link
Contributor Author

sorry, I have no idea. I filed this almost 10 years ago

JoesCat added a commit to JoesCat/android-udev-rules that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2023
initial patch was to add android links, however, based on looking at
libmtp these are both mtp, therefore changed these to adb+mtp, while
the mtp-only product was dropped and left for libmtp to handle since
it appears there is no adb for this. More details given in issue M0Rf30#46
M0Rf30 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2023
initial patch was to add android links, however, based on looking at
libmtp these are both mtp, therefore changed these to adb+mtp, while
the mtp-only product was dropped and left for libmtp to handle since
it appears there is no adb for this. More details given in issue #46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants