Refactor NFT transfer verification

[bobanm]

What was the problem?

This PR resolves #8954, resolves #8986, partially resolves #8961 and resolves #9066

How was it solved?

• Extracted common verification functionality to internal method, both for transfer and transfer cross chain scenarios
• Both commands and methods use the internal verification method, instead of quadruplicating the verification logic
• Fixed invalid tests

How was it tested?

All the existing tests are passing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #9005 (36c2039) into release/6.1.0 (d9e8a89) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 91.45%.

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           release/6.1.0    #9005      +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage          84.36%   84.34%   -0.02%     
=================================================
  Files                651      652       +1     
  Lines              23977    23972       -5     
  Branches            3488     3486       -2     
=================================================
- Hits               20227    20220       -7     
- Misses              3750     3752       +2     

Files	Coverage Δ
framework/src/modules/nft/commands/transfer.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...k/src/modules/nft/commands/transfer_cross_chain.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
framework/src/modules/nft/error.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
framework/src/modules/nft/events/unlock.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (+28.57%)	⬆️
framework/src/modules/nft/internal_method.ts	97.14% <94.11%> (-2.86%)	⬇️
framework/src/modules/nft/module.ts	85.93% <0.00%> (ø)
framework/src/modules/nft/method.ts	98.71% <91.66%> (-0.40%)	⬇️

[mjerkov]

Nice refactorization, this part will have to be touched upon again when getNFT is introduced, and getChainID, getNFTOwner, and getLockingModule are removed.