Implement min return fee per byte for CCMs

[mitsuaki-u]

What was the problem?

This PR resolves #8147

How was it solved?

Added minReturnFeePerByte to schemas, types, commands.

How was it tested?

Added and updated existing unit tests

[ishantiw]

apart from the comments from @sitetester , one more comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #8170 (ec9161a) into development (6d3611a) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 94.11%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           development    #8170   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        82.75%   82.76%           
============================================
  Files              578      578           
  Lines            21114    21128   +14     
  Branches          3078     3084    +6     
============================================
+ Hits             17473    17486   +13     
- Misses            3641     3642    +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...erability/mainchain/commands/register_sidechain.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
framework/src/modules/interoperability/schemas.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...erability/sidechain/commands/register_mainchain.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...rc/modules/interoperability/stores/channel_data.ts	86.66% <ø> (ø)
...s/interoperability/base_interoperability_method.ts	90.00% <90.00%> (ø)
.../interoperability/base_cc_commands/registration.ts	92.45% <100.00%> (+0.29%)	⬆️
...nteroperability/base_cross_chain_update_command.ts	98.79% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
...interoperability/base_interoperability_endpoint.ts	98.21% <100.00%> (ø)
...ramework/src/modules/interoperability/constants.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)