Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
update
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
agricolamz committed Feb 28, 2024
1 parent 57841b8 commit 735264f
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions.
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions result_en.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,6 +52,17 @@ <h2 class="anchored" data-anchor-id="seminars-of-the-linguistic-convergence-labo
<h3 class="anchored" data-anchor-id="seminar-schedule-2024">Seminar schedule 2024</h3>
<div class="columns">
<div class="column" style="width:15%;">
<p><strong>5 March</strong></p>
</div><div class="column" style="width:85%;">
<p><em>John Mansfield (University of Zurich)</em></p>
<p><strong>When social contact promotes diversification</strong></p>
<details>
<summary>
Abstract
</summary>
In much linguistic literature, small, socially isolated speech communities are the main locus of diversification and grammatical complexity (e.g.&nbsp;Trudgill 2011). Similarly, linguistic differentiation is traditionally viewed as resulting from social separation of groups (Paul 1888), while intensive social contact between groups can lead to structural convergence of their languages (e.g.&nbsp;Gumperz &amp; Wilson 1971; Ross 1996). However, sociolinguistic literature shows that social groups in regular contact use language as a way of developing and maintaining distinct group identities (Eckert 2008), and in regions with many small ethnic groups this can drive diversification (François 2011; Evans 2019; Epps 2020), a kind of ‘sympatric speciation’ in linguistic evolution. In this presentation I consider evidence for contact-driven diversification, paying particular attention to which dimensions of language may be used to index group identity. I present a cross-linguistic database on dialect differentiation, which analyses grammatical variation and dialect differences in 42 languages, drawing on data from reference grammars. The main finding is that grammatical ordering very rarely differentiates dialects in close contact, but the form of grammatical markers (affixes, clitics and function words) frequently <em>does</em> differentiate dialects in close contact.
</details>
</div><div class="column" style="width:15%;">
<p><strong>27 February</strong></p>
</div><div class="column" style="width:85%;">
<p><em>Silvia Luraghi (University of Pavia) and Chiara Zanchi (University of Pavia)</em></p>
Expand Down
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions result_ru.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,6 +52,17 @@ <h2 class="anchored" data-anchor-id="семинары-международной
<h3 class="anchored" data-anchor-id="расписание-семинаров-в-2024-году">Расписание семинаров в 2024 году</h3>
<div class="columns">
<div class="column" style="width:15%;">
<p><strong>5 марта</strong></p>
</div><div class="column" style="width:85%;">
<p><em>John Mansfield (University of Zurich)</em></p>
<p><strong>When social contact promotes diversification</strong></p>
<details>
<summary>
Аннотация
</summary>
In much linguistic literature, small, socially isolated speech communities are the main locus of diversification and grammatical complexity (e.g.&nbsp;Trudgill 2011). Similarly, linguistic differentiation is traditionally viewed as resulting from social separation of groups (Paul 1888), while intensive social contact between groups can lead to structural convergence of their languages (e.g.&nbsp;Gumperz &amp; Wilson 1971; Ross 1996). However, sociolinguistic literature shows that social groups in regular contact use language as a way of developing and maintaining distinct group identities (Eckert 2008), and in regions with many small ethnic groups this can drive diversification (François 2011; Evans 2019; Epps 2020), a kind of ‘sympatric speciation’ in linguistic evolution. In this presentation I consider evidence for contact-driven diversification, paying particular attention to which dimensions of language may be used to index group identity. I present a cross-linguistic database on dialect differentiation, which analyses grammatical variation and dialect differences in 42 languages, drawing on data from reference grammars. The main finding is that grammatical ordering very rarely differentiates dialects in close contact, but the form of grammatical markers (affixes, clitics and function words) frequently <em>does</em> differentiate dialects in close contact.
</details>
</div><div class="column" style="width:15%;">
<p><strong>27 февраля</strong></p>
</div><div class="column" style="width:85%;">
<p><em>Silvia Luraghi (University of Pavia) and Chiara Zanchi (University of Pavia)</em></p>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 735264f

Please sign in to comment.