bump: Torch 2.5.0

[Borda]

What does this PR do?

aligning with the recent release of PT 2.5

Before submitting

• Was this discussed/agreed via a Github issue? (no need for typos and docs improvements)
• Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
• Did you make sure to update the docs?
• Did you write any new necessary tests?

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://torchmetrics--2790.org.readthedocs.build/en/2790/

[Borda]

FAILED unittests/bases/test_collections.py::test_metric_collection_prefix_postfix_args[None-None] - AssertionError: assert False
 +  where False = isinstance(dict_keys(['DummyMetricSum', 'DummyMetricDiff']), <class 'odict_keys'>)
 +    where dict_keys(['DummyMetricSum', 'DummyMetricDiff']) = keys(keep_base=True)
 +      where keys = MetricCollection(\n  (DummyMetricSum): DummyMetricSum()\n  (DummyMetricDiff): DummyMetricDiff(),\n  prefix=new_prefix_\n).keys
 +    and   <class 'odict_keys'> = type(odict_keys(['new_prefix_DummyMetricSum', 'new_prefix_DummyMetricDiff']))
 +      where odict_keys(['new_prefix_DummyMetricSum', 'new_prefix_DummyMetricDiff']) = keys(keep_base=False)
 +        where keys = MetricCollection(\n  (DummyMetricSum): DummyMetricSum()\n  (DummyMetricDiff): DummyMetricDiff(),\n  prefix=new_prefix_\n).keys
FAILED unittests/bases/test_collections.py::test_metric_collection_prefix_postfix_args[prefix_-None] - AssertionError: assert False
 +  where False = isinstance(dict_keys(['DummyMetricSum', 'DummyMetricDiff']), <class 'odict_keys'>)
 +    where dict_keys(['DummyMetricSum', 'DummyMetricDiff']) = keys(keep_base=True)
 +      where keys = MetricCollection(\n  (DummyMetricSum): DummyMetricSum()\n  (DummyMetricDiff): DummyMetricDiff(),\n  prefix=new_prefix_\n).keys
 +    and   <class 'odict_keys'> = type(odict_keys(['new_prefix_DummyMetricSum', 'new_prefix_DummyMetricDiff']))
 +      where odict_keys(['new_prefix_DummyMetricSum', 'new_prefix_DummyMetricDiff']) = keys(keep_base=False)
 +        where keys = MetricCollection(\n  (DummyMetricSum): DummyMetricSum()\n  (DummyMetricDiff): DummyMetricDiff(),\n  prefix=new_prefix_\n).keys
FAILED unittests/bases/test_collections.py::test_metric_collection_prefix_postfix_args[None-_postfix] - AssertionError: assert False
 +  where False = isinstance(dict_keys(['DummyMetricSum', 'DummyMetricDiff']), <class 'odict_keys'>)
 +    where dict_keys(['DummyMetricSum', 'DummyMetricDiff']) = keys(keep_base=True)
 +      where keys = MetricCollection(\n  (DummyMetricSum): DummyMetricSum()\n  (DummyMetricDiff): DummyMetricDiff(),\n  prefix=new_prefix_,\n  postfix=_postfix\n).keys
 +    and   <class 'odict_keys'> = type(odict_keys(['new_prefix_DummyMetricSum_postfix', 'new_prefix_DummyMetricDiff_postfix']))
 +      where odict_keys(['new_prefix_DummyMetricSum_postfix', 'new_prefix_DummyMetricDiff_postfix']) = keys(keep_base=False)
 +        where keys = MetricCollection(\n  (DummyMetricSum): DummyMetricSum()\n  (DummyMetricDiff): DummyMetricDiff(),\n  prefix=new_prefix_,\n  postfix=_postfix\n).keys
FAILED unittests/bases/test_collections.py::test_metric_collection_prefix_postfix_args[prefix_-_postfix] - AssertionError: assert False
 +  where False = isinstance(dict_keys(['DummyMetricSum', 'DummyMetricDiff']), <class 'odict_keys'>)
 +    where dict_keys(['DummyMetricSum', 'DummyMetricDiff']) = keys(keep_base=True)
 +      where keys = MetricCollection(\n  (DummyMetricSum): DummyMetricSum()\n  (DummyMetricDiff): DummyMetricDiff(),\n  prefix=new_prefix_,\n  postfix=_postfix\n).keys
 +    and   <class 'odict_keys'> = type(odict_keys(['new_prefix_DummyMetricSum_postfix', 'new_prefix_DummyMetricDiff_postfix']))
 +      where odict_keys(['new_prefix_DummyMetricSum_postfix', 'new_prefix_DummyMetricDiff_postfix']) = keys(keep_base=False)
 +        where keys = MetricCollection(\n  (DummyMetricSum): DummyMetricSum()\n  (DummyMetricDiff): DummyMetricDiff(),\n  prefix=new_prefix_,\n  postfix=_postfix\n).keys
FAILED unittests/wrappers/test_multitask.py::test_error_on_wrong_keys - AssertionError: Regex pattern did not match.
 Regex: "Expected\\ arguments\\ `task_preds`\\ and\\ `task_targets`\\ to\\ have\\ the\\ same\\ keys\\ as\\ the\\ wrapped\\ `task_metrics`\\.\\ Found\\ task_preds\\.keys\\(\\)\\ =\\ dict_keys\\(\\['Classification'\\]\\),\\ task_targets\\.keys\\(\\)\\ =\\ dict_keys\\(\\['Classification',\\ 'Regression'\\]\\)\\ and\\ self\\.task_metrics\\.keys\\(\\)\\ =\\ odict_keys\\(\\['Classification',\\ 'Regression'\\]\\)"
 Input: "Expected arguments `task_preds` and `task_targets` to have the same keys as the wrapped `task_metrics`. Found task_preds.keys() = dict_keys(['Classification']), task_targets.keys() = dict_keys(['Classification', 'Regression']) and self.task_metrics.keys() = dict_keys(['Classification', 'Regression'])"

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69%. Comparing base (346bcdc) to head (d77942c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2790   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage      69%     69%           
======================================
  Files         336     336           
  Lines       18215   18215           
======================================
  Hits        12494   12494           
  Misses       5721    5721           

[SkafteNicki]

Failing tests most likely related to #2789

[Borda]

Failing tests most likely related to #2789

I see... @SkafteNicki how about merging this with failing tests for 2.5 but enabling the testing so @bfolie can send a PR which will be validated straight away :)

[SkafteNicki]

Failing tests most likely related to #2789

I see... @SkafteNicki how about merging this with failing tests for 2.5 but enabling the testing so @bfolie can send a PR which will be validated straight away :)

I prefer the other PR is open before we merge this so we can instantly evaluate if anything else is missing. Else let me check locally if anything else is missing