Fix is_interactive_compatible logic after AcceleratorConnector rewrite

[awaelchli]

What does this PR do?

Follow up to #11448
The PR introduced a bug with Jupyter notebooks because the strategy name property was changed. The check how it is implemented now doesn't make much sense.

#11970 proposes to move it to the strategy base class itself but my proposal here is to move it to the newly added launcher. IMO this fixes the issue more efficiently.

Notebook for manual checking.

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

No.

Before submitting

• Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
• Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
• Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
• Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
• Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
• Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
• Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

• Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
• Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
• Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
• Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

I made sure I had fun coding 🙃

cc @Borda @tchaton @rohitgr7 @akihironitta @justusschock @kaushikb11 @awaelchli @ninginthecloud

[carmocca]

Maybe worth waiting until #11966 is merged so Adrian's comment can be addressed here