Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cloudformation templates to deploy feature branch to crowd-test #758

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jan 17, 2019

Conversation

rstorey
Copy link
Member

@rstorey rstorey commented Jan 11, 2019

I wish I didn't have to make a special copy of the elasticache template for this, but I couldn't figure out how to pass the list of subnet IDs as a string as required. Any thoughts on that?

I'm also not sure if the parameter "ConcordiaBranch" should actually be "DockerTag" since that's what it is. I'm making the assumption that Jenkins (or something) will build and publish feature branches to our container repository with the docker tag = branch name. Jenkins is doing this already

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 14, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 69.456% when pulling d07deb6 on deploy-feature-branch into d8cc4b6 on master.

@rstorey rstorey force-pushed the deploy-feature-branch branch from d53bbf0 to 2f6a2fd Compare January 14, 2019 19:36
@rstorey rstorey requested a review from acdha January 14, 2019 19:37
@rstorey rstorey changed the title WIP: Deploy feature branch to crowd-test Cloudformation templates to deploy feature branch to crowd-test Jan 14, 2019
acdha
acdha previously approved these changes Jan 17, 2019
Copy link
Member

@acdha acdha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This generally looks good to me. The one question I had is whether we should be taking the time now to convert the hard-coded names for security groups, VPC IDs, etc. into output references or not. I'm slightly hesitant to do so since that adds more exposure to CloudFormation bugs but it would reduce the number of updates.

@rstorey
Copy link
Member Author

rstorey commented Jan 17, 2019

This generally looks good to me. The one question I had is whether we should be taking the time now to convert the hard-coded names for security groups, VPC IDs, etc. into output references or not. I'm slightly hesitant to do so since that adds more exposure to CloudFormation bugs but it would reduce the number of updates.

I was sorta thinking that too. Like, what if we decide we want to push feature branches to crowd-dev or something, what would the changes need to be, what should be parameterized, etc. But, I figured I'd address that if / when we decide to do this sort of thing again in a different VPC.

@rstorey rstorey merged commit b2eb06d into master Jan 17, 2019
@rstorey rstorey deleted the deploy-feature-branch branch January 17, 2019 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants