-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: pimp out readme with blob lifecycle diagrams #233
docs: pimp out readme with blob lifecycle diagrams #233
Conversation
We changed the name in README so should be consistent in the code
Posting Blobs -> Posting Payloads Retrieving Blobs -> Retrieving Payloads
resources/sequence-diagram.png
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice chart
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you want to use the updated the chart, Austin and us draw yesterday
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call! sorry merged this PR before seeing your comment. Created #256 to change the image
Add some intro section, and add links to Integration Guide
* fix(#251): better error logging for RPC lookup errors against service manager (#254) * chore: modify verifier to not require eth archive node (#241) * chore: force verifier's EthConfirmationDepth to be <64 We panic in the flag's action, as well as in the verifier's constructor when this condition is not respected. This will make sure that an archival node is not required. * chore: modify verifier to load quorum parameters only once at initialization This removes the need for running with an eth archive node. * style: fix minor lint issue * docs: update README to mention that archival node is no longer needed * docs: clean-up README archival node requirement explanation * docs: fix verify/cert.go comment typo Co-authored-by: Ethen <[email protected]> * docs: for eg -> e.g. * style(cert): remove unecessary bound checks from inside loop * style: create consts package with EthHappyPathFinalizationDepthBlocks = 64 * style: change panic into error return * docs: change op reference for eth reference * docs: make flag comment simpler * Update verify/cert.go Co-authored-by: EthenNotEthan <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Ethen <[email protected]> * docs: pimp out readme with blob lifecycle diagrams (#233) * chore: move pull_request_template.md under .github/ dir * docs: reorder README sections to feel more natural (move flags to bottom) * docs (wip): add blob lifecycle diagrams to README * docs: remove Sidecar from README title (proxy is not necessarily a side) * docs: add blob lifecycle section to README * docs: add TOC to README * style(routing): rename raw_commitment -> payload We changed the name in README so should be consistent in the code * docs: update README sections to use Payload instead of Blob Posting Blobs -> Posting Payloads Retrieving Blobs -> Retrieving Payloads * docs: remove "obviously" word * Required quorums glitch (#255) * Avoid quorum 1 check on range of Holesky blocks * Improve SVC address check * Update verify/verifier.go Co-authored-by: Samuel Laferriere <[email protected]> * Update verify/verifier.go Co-authored-by: Samuel Laferriere <[email protected]> * Avoid unnecessary cast * Rename constant * Fix lint --------- Co-authored-by: Samuel Laferriere <[email protected]> * docs: update README posting payload image (#256) * fix: remove last eth_call that required archive node (#259) Forgot this one in #241 * docs: update SECURITY.md with audit commit + fix small typos (#263) * docs: update SECURITY.md * docs: update SECURITY.md with audited release number + release where findings were addressed * feat: EigenDAV2 commitment processing and generation * feat: EigenDAV2 commitment processing and generation - add note describing follow up todo --------- Co-authored-by: Samuel Laferriere <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gaston Ponti <[email protected]>
We have a full spec coming so perhaps some of the stuff here will be redundant and we can remove it and just point to the spec once it's ready. But in the meantime I think it's good to have more (rather than less) info.
Main changes include:
Fixes Issue
Fixes #
Changes proposed
Screenshots (Optional)
Note to reviewers