You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now that the structure of BTK is mostly fixed, we should address some issues regarding the input and the outputs.
The output for multiple surveys is like blend_results["blend_images"]["LSST"] while the output for several measure functions is like measure_results["sep_measure0"]["deblended_images"]. I think we should swap the order for the surveys.
We should think about how to handle the case where only one survey/measure function/measure_kwargs is inputted. Right now, surveys must be given as a list, but does not take the "dictionary form" when there is only one survey. For measure functions, the input is always a list and the output is always a dictionary index by the names of the functions. For the measure_kwargs, the input is a list (or None) and the output adds numbers to the end of the measure function name (hence the "sep_measure0"), even when the input is None or a list of length one. I personally feel that the best would be to have the possibility to give a single element and get the results in the "simple form", or give a list of elements and get the results in the "dictionary form" ; for the measure_kwargs this would mean not adding the zero in the name ; it would add some code though to do all the checks though.
Now that the structure of BTK is mostly fixed, we should address some issues regarding the input and the outputs.
blend_results["blend_images"]["LSST"]
while the output for several measure functions is likemeasure_results["sep_measure0"]["deblended_images"]
. I think we should swap the order for the surveys.meas_bands
in DrawBlendGenerator andmeas_band_num
in MetricsGenerator? #152 , the meas_bands are not really handled correctly right nowThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: