Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Guard buckling example against no-petsc build #1217

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

chapman39
Copy link
Contributor

@chapman39 chapman39 commented Aug 22, 2024

Checks if petsc is found for the new-ish buckling example.

Fixes #1216

@chapman39 chapman39 self-assigned this Aug 22, 2024
@chapman39 chapman39 added bug Something isn't working CI Continuous Integration build Build system labels Aug 22, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@tupek2 tupek2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this going to add an additional build to our tests?

@chapman39
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is this going to add an additional build to our tests?

Yes. The other option would be to combine all the disable-X (tribol, sundials, petsc) into one job, but that wouldn't be as robust.

@tupek2 tupek2 closed this Aug 22, 2024
@tupek2 tupek2 reopened this Aug 22, 2024
@tupek2
Copy link
Collaborator

tupek2 commented Aug 22, 2024

I would vote to try and reduce our testing overhead. I think its becoming way too much of a bottleneck. Combining them would be OK with me, its not clear what scenario that would be missing.

@chapman39
Copy link
Contributor Author

im going to remove the extra job from this PR for now and create a separate issue. since in any case we should resolve the buckling example issue.

@chapman39 chapman39 changed the title Test no petsc and guard buckling example Guard buckling example against no-petsc build Aug 22, 2024
@chapman39 chapman39 requested a review from tupek2 August 22, 2024 22:03
@chapman39 chapman39 added the ready for review Ready for active inspection by reviewers label Aug 22, 2024
@chapman39 chapman39 merged commit be917a5 into develop Aug 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@tupek2 tupek2 deleted the bugfix/chapman39/guard-pesc branch November 1, 2024 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working build Build system CI Continuous Integration ready for review Ready for active inspection by reviewers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Guard buckling example
3 participants