-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Guard buckling example against no-petsc build #1217
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this going to add an additional build to our tests?
Yes. The other option would be to combine all the disable-X (tribol, sundials, petsc) into one job, but that wouldn't be as robust. |
I would vote to try and reduce our testing overhead. I think its becoming way too much of a bottleneck. Combining them would be OK with me, its not clear what scenario that would be missing. |
im going to remove the extra job from this PR for now and create a separate issue. since in any case we should resolve the buckling example issue. |
Checks if petsc is found for the new-ish buckling example.
Fixes #1216