Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: opj should failed if ops not found pod #308

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ColdsteelRail
Copy link
Member

1. Does this PR affect any open issues?(Y/N) and add issue references (e.g. "fix #123", "re #123".):

  • N
  • Y

2. What is the scope of this PR (e.g. component or file name):

3. Provide a description of the PR(e.g. more details, effects, motivations or doc link):

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Other

4. Are there any breaking changes?(Y/N) and describe the breaking changes(e.g. more details, motivations or doc link):

  • N
  • Y

5. Are there test cases for these changes?(Y/N) select and add more details, references or doc links:

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Benchmark (add benchmark stats below)
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • Other

6. Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ColdsteelRail ColdsteelRail changed the title ops-not-found-pod fix: opj should failed if ops not found pod Nov 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 66.04%. Comparing base (1f4d86d) to head (e927b8c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...g/controllers/operationjob/operationjob_manager.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #308      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.03%   66.04%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          79       79              
  Lines        5753     5764      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         3799     3807       +8     
- Misses       1593     1598       +5     
+ Partials      361      359       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 66.04% <0.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

提供灰度流量的能力
1 participant