Enable configuring PDB from Limitador CR

[adam-cattermole]

Added ability to configure PodDisruptionBudget from Limitador CR.

Defining a limitador CR with the pdb set results in an associated PodDisruptionBudget object to be created.

apiVersion: limitador.kuadrant.io/v1alpha1
kind: Limitador
metadata:
  name: limitador-sample
spec:
  pdb:
    maxUnavailable: 1

kind: PodDisruptionBudget
apiVersion: policy/v1
metadata:
  name: limitador-limitador-sample
spec:
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: limitador
  maxUnavailable: 1

Also added new make target make local-redeploy that re-builds image locally and rolls out deployment in kind cluster with the local changes.

Resolves #75

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #91 (ad29718) into main (e110bb7) will increase coverage by 0.52%.
The diff coverage is 49.46%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #91      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.31%   43.83%   +0.52%     
==========================================
  Files          11       12       +1     
  Lines         718      803      +85     
==========================================
+ Hits          311      352      +41     
- Misses        369      408      +39     
- Partials       38       43       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	43.83% <49.46%> (+0.52%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
pkg/reconcilers/base_reconciler.go	34.54% <0.00%> (-0.64%)	⬇️
pkg/reconcilers/poddisruptionbudget.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
controllers/limitador_controller.go	42.05% <44.73%> (+0.57%)	⬆️
pkg/limitador/k8s_objects.go	71.42% <87.87%> (+3.74%)	⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[Boomatang]

Happy path works but I did find two issue that will need to be addressed.

1. The user is allowed to state the selector fields in the limitador CR but this ignored by the operator. In this case it might better to not allow the user state the selector fields.
2. The selector field of app is not unique and would apply to multiply limitador CR deploy of which all may have different conflicting PDB polices.

There are a few smaller comments but that is the big points.

[Boomatang]

All the issue and change request have being addressed. I would be happy to see this merged.