-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release request of v2.2.3 #187
Comments
I would like kinovarobotics to make a separate branch for v2.2.x, not v2.3.x. |
Hi @708yamaguchi and @knorth55, If I understand correctly, you are using an old firmware version, which means you cannot use any commit past Did I understand it correctly? Regards, |
@felixmaisonneuve yes, your understanding is correct. |
Then the answer is no, we will not make a separate branch for v2.2. It is better to simply update the arm firmware to 2.3. We support ROS Melodic and ROS Noetic, which means we would need 2 branches for v2.3 (Noetic and Melodic) to also 2 branches for v2.2. Then, for each new modifications, we would need to duplicate the work to 4 branches. Plus, we would need to test with a v2.3 arm and a v2.2 to make sure everything is working fine. this would soon become overly complex (e.g. if a modification is not working on v2.2). Basically, it would require a lot of work to maintain for little to no gain. Again, the easiest solution is to update your arm firmware. If you absolutely want to keep v2.2 (for whatever reason it is), you will have to manually update your fork of the repo. There is plenty of ways you can do it. For example, you can add The point is, you would have to deal with the conflicts/incompatibilities and we will have no garanty that it will work in the end. I will close this issue since this is not something we will implement, but thank you for your suggestion. Regards, |
We know it is a lot of work. We can work on our fork, but if we work on our fork, it is not beneficial for everyone in terms of open source because every one do their improvemen in their forks. Anyway, I can understand your decision. It makes sense. |
Summary
Release request of v2.2.3, which includes #173
Use case
We use kinova gen3 lite robot with v2.2 firmware.
https://www.kinovarobotics.com/en/resources/gen3-technical-resources
We want to use #173 feature with this firmware.
Alternative
Currently, we use our original branch.
https://github.com/708yamaguchi/ros_kortex/tree/develop/spot
Possible issues
I think there will be no problem by this feature.
Additional context
cc @knorth55 @sktometometo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: