Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AssetRegistry #55

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 13, 2018
Merged

AssetRegistry #55

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 13, 2018

Conversation

shashi
Copy link
Collaborator

@shashi shashi commented May 23, 2018

Introduce a common package which holds a key -> path dictionary of files to serve by default in Mux.

Packages interested in serving static files can register with this base package without depending on Mux.

Co-authored by: Ranjan Anantharaman <[email protected]>
Co-authored by: Shashi Gowda <[email protected]>
@shashi shashi changed the title WIP: AssetRegistry AssetRegistry Jun 13, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 13, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #55 into master will increase coverage by 0.3%.
The diff coverage is 50%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master      #55     +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   54.86%   55.17%   +0.3%     
=========================================
  Files           7        7             
  Lines         113      116      +3     
=========================================
+ Hits           62       64      +2     
- Misses         51       52      +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Mux.jl 75% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/examples/files.jl 19.04% <50%> (+7.93%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c83c057...fdb0dea. Read the comment docs.

@shashi shashi merged commit 0ab1f0c into master Jun 13, 2018
@shashi shashi deleted the s/asset-registry branch June 13, 2018 08:13
@ranjanan
Copy link

I think we have to change the README also? Or at least say /pkg/ is deprecated behaviour

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants