Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove internal URIs module and depend on URIs.jl instead #616

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2020

Conversation

c42f
Copy link
Contributor

@c42f c42f commented Nov 3, 2020

Everything from the internal URIs module has been moved to URIs.jl, with
the exception of the resource() function which is HTTP specific.
(request-target defined in HTTP/1.1
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-5.3).

This was moved into MessageRequest.jl as it appears it's only used in
implementing request(). Currently it's also available as HTTP.resource()
in case somebody was relying on it.

See also JuliaWeb/URIs.jl#2

Closes #605

Everything from the internal URIs module has been moved to URIs.jl, with
the exception of the resource() function which is HTTP specific.
(request-target defined in HTTP/1.1
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-5.3).

This was moved into MessageRequest.jl as it appears it's only used in
implementing `request()`.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the test label Nov 3, 2020
@c42f
Copy link
Contributor Author

c42f commented Nov 3, 2020

I thought we should get this done to avoid any more duplicate work as in
#609
JuliaWeb/URIs.jl#5

Copy link
Member

@quinnj quinnj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this!

@quinnj quinnj merged commit cf438e9 into master Nov 3, 2020
@quinnj quinnj deleted the cjf/move-URIs branch November 3, 2020 06:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Splitting out URI parsing into URIs.jl
2 participants