-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add benchmark GHA #710
add benchmark GHA #710
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #710 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.83% 95.83%
=======================================
Files 35 35
Lines 3267 3267
=======================================
Hits 3131 3131
Misses 136 136
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I think many of simple scalar benchmarks are unnecessary because they take so little time. They can show large relative differences because the denominator is so small. We may want to just run the crossed vector benchmarks. |
bb2ace8
to
aa5f3fc
Compare
aa5f3fc
to
dec41ee
Compare
Benchmark Report for /home/runner/work/MixedModels.jl/MixedModels.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTarget
Baseline
|
Co-authored-by: Alex Arslan <[email protected]>
No description provided.