Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version: PositiveIntegrators v0.1.5 #104380

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: d1b20bf0-b083-4985-a874-dc5121669aa5
Repo: https://github.com/SKopecz/PositiveIntegrators.jl.git
Tree: b2a564d33623e4874031670a533bc01f8df5fe1e

Registrator tree SHA: 17aec322677d9b81cdd6b9b9236b09a3f1374c6a
JuliaRegistrator referenced this pull request in SKopecz/PositiveIntegrators.jl Apr 6, 2024
…ctorization()` (#60)

* use LinearSolve.jl for in-place MPRK22 and set default alg to LUFactorization()

* format

* set version to v0.1.5
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2024

Your new version pull request met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged in the next round.


If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment. You can edit blocking comments, adding [noblock] to them in order to unblock auto-merging.

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot merged commit 9360ea2 into master Apr 6, 2024
17 checks passed
@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot deleted the registrator-positiveintegrators-d1b20bf0-v0.1.5-0b7f4c8f46 branch April 6, 2024 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants