Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CompatHelper: bump compat for ModelingToolkit to 9 for package docs, (keep existing compat) #114

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

This pull request changes the compat entry for the ModelingToolkit package from 8 to 8, 9 for package docs.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the compathelper/new_version/2024-02-23-00-54-44-858-03904887873 branch from 938e629 to bfbfe63 Compare February 23, 2024 00:54
@schillic schillic marked this pull request as draft February 23, 2024 08:49
@schillic
Copy link
Member

This PR should not be merged as long as v9 of ModelingToolkit cannot be tested (there were several breaking changes). See below (cause: ReachabilityAnalysis holds back TaylorIntegration).

(docs) pkg> add ModelingToolkit@9
   Resolving package versions...
ERROR: Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package SymbolicIndexingInterface [2efcf032]:
 SymbolicIndexingInterface [2efcf032] log:
 ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-0.3.7 or uninstalled
 ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with ModelingToolkit [961ee093] to versions: 0.3.1-0.3.7
 │ └─ModelingToolkit [961ee093] log:
 │   ├─possible versions are: 0.0.1-9.0.1 or uninstalled
 │   └─restricted to versions 9 by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions: 9.0.0-9.0.1
 └─restricted by compatibility requirements with RecursiveArrayTools [731186ca] to versions: 0.1.0-0.2.2 — no versions left
   └─RecursiveArrayTools [731186ca] log:
     ├─possible versions are: 0.16.0-3.10.0 or uninstalled
     ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with ReachabilityAnalysis [1e97bd63] to versions: 2.0.0-3.10.0
     │ └─ReachabilityAnalysis [1e97bd63] log:
     │   ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-0.24.0 or uninstalled
     │   ├─restricted to versions 0.18.6-0.24 by ReachabilityModels [20aa409e], leaving only versions: 0.18.6-0.24.0
     │   │ └─ReachabilityModels [20aa409e] log:
     │   │   ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0 or uninstalled
     │   │   └─ReachabilityModels [20aa409e] is fixed to version 0.1.0
     │   └─restricted to versions 0.22-0.24 by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions: 0.22.0-0.24.0
     ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with ModelingToolkit [961ee093] to versions: 2.3.0-3.10.0
     │ └─ModelingToolkit [961ee093] log: see above
     ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with TaylorIntegration [92b13dbe] to versions: 2.0.0-2.38.10, leaving only versions: 2.3.0-2.38.10
     │ └─TaylorIntegration [92b13dbe] log:
     │   ├─possible versions are: 0.4.0-0.14.7 or uninstalled
     │   └─restricted by compatibility requirements with ReachabilityAnalysis [1e97bd63] to versions: 0.9.0-0.10.0
     │     └─ReachabilityAnalysis [1e97bd63] log: see above
     └─restricted by compatibility requirements with SciMLBase [0bca4576] to versions: 2.33.0-3.10.0, leaving only versions: 2.33.0-2.38.10
       └─SciMLBase [0bca4576] log:
         ├─possible versions are: 1.0.0-2.26.2 or uninstalled
         ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with ModelingToolkit [961ee093] to versions: 2.0.1-2.26.2
         │ └─ModelingToolkit [961ee093] log: see above
         └─restricted by compatibility requirements with RecursiveArrayTools [731186ca] to versions: 1.0.0-2.10.0 or uninstalled, leaving only versions: 2.0.1-2.10.0
           └─RecursiveArrayTools [731186ca] log: see above

@schillic schillic closed this in #127 Jun 2, 2024
@schillic schillic deleted the compathelper/new_version/2024-02-23-00-54-44-858-03904887873 branch June 2, 2024 20:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant