Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update auto calibration #57

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

theHenks
Copy link
Contributor

Auto calibration determines uses determine_calibration_constant_through_peak_ratios by filtering peaks based on centroid and FWHM values calculated on the histogram rather than fitting to avoid running into very long optimizer runs.

…ion and fwhm values based on histograms than based on fits to avoid fitter errors
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.68%. Comparing base (62d726b) to head (e909993).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
src/AutoCalibration/AutoCalibration.jl 96.77% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/general_tools.jl 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #57      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.53%   89.68%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines         583      611      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits          522      548      +26     
- Misses         61       63       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@theHenks theHenks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@oschulz oschulz merged commit 58a193f into JuliaPhysics:main Aug 16, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants