-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
JuliaMath organization details #2
Comments
I made you an owner here, since you're encouragingly enthusiastic about it. Everything you propose sounds great, as does your list of packages in #1. |
@tkelman Thanks! 🎉 |
JuliaMath should definitely get a Gitter. The Gitter communities are pretty key to Julia. |
@ChrisRackauckas That's a good idea. I'll put that on the to-do list. |
I'd be interested in helping JuliaMath get this together. |
@ChrisRackauckas I've invited you to join the org. I don't know anything about gitter, but if you need more permissions let me know. |
Someone with owner permissions needs to accept the OAuth I requested (it should email you?). I'll use that to set the org channel to public so it's not tied to a repo (I think owner permissions are needed for this since the org isn't showing up) |
It looks like I'll need more permissions. Also, is anyone looking into putting together the site? |
I don't know that we'd have much to say on a site at the moment. Maybe once the primes deprecation makes its way into the Julia news. |
I'll probably get one up and running a few weeks from now then. I think it should get put together so that future changes are easy: just update the text. |
After Post: JuliaLang/julia#16357 (comment) See Roadmap: JuliaMath/Roadmap.jl#2
I noticed on the Google Group it says "Here we discuss mathematical programming in Julia". Mathematical programming is definitely not what we cover: that would be in JuliaOpt. |
I've heard linear and nonlinear programming used to refer to optimization but not mathematical programming. I'd be happy to change it if you have a better suggestion though. |
It's pretty common, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_optimization Maybe something like "Here we discuss using Julia to solve mathematical problems"? |
e.g. http://www.ismp2015.org/ (we had a whole Julia session there last year, was a little JuliaOpt party) |
@ChrisRackauckas Nice, changed to that. |
It appears JuliaStats has a website, a Google group, an org description, an expanded name ("Julia Statistics"), and a logo (which will hopefully be unique soon). I think we should definitely do the latter three and perhaps the former two once we've grown more.
Here's what I'm thinking:
Description: Mathematics made easy in Julia
Expanded name: Julia Mathematics
Logo: Definitely @mschauer's proposal using Julia sets
(Admittedly that proposed description is stolen from JuliaStats). What say ye?
Stuff to do:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: