Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix methodswith consistency #41016

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 31, 2021

Conversation

endremborza
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #41010

changes output of methodswith, so technically breaking, but as argued in the issue it can be considered a bug

@endremborza endremborza changed the title Fix methodwsith consistency Fix methodswith consistency May 30, 2021
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you change this to use Callable instead? Thanks for looking into this!

@endremborza
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks for the quick reply

I'm sorry I didn't know about that. Was thinking about creating a const to make it dry, but I now know that there is Base.Callable

@vtjnash vtjnash added the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label May 31, 2021
@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

vtjnash commented May 31, 2021

It was a great PR, no need to apologize!

@vtjnash vtjnash merged commit b3bb9ce into JuliaLang:master May 31, 2021
shirodkara pushed a commit to shirodkara/julia that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2021
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge removed the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Jun 18, 2021
johanmon pushed a commit to johanmon/julia that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

methods and methodswith asymmetry
3 participants