Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the PR was not mentioned in NEWS.md, fix #34465

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2020
Merged

the PR was not mentioned in NEWS.md, fix #34465

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
48cf362
the PR was not mentioned in NEWS.md, fix
tpapp Jan 21, 2020
7039888
dot goes outside sentence
tpapp Jan 21, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion NEWS.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ New library functions
* The new `only(x)` function returns the one-and-only element of a collection `x`, and throws an `ArgumentError` if `x` contains zero or multiple elements ([#33129]).
* `takewhile` and `dropwhile` have been added to the Iterators submodule ([#33437]).
* `accumulate` has been added to the Iterators submodule ([#34033]).
* There is a now an `evalpoly` function meant to take the role of the `@evalpoly` macro. The function is just as efficient as the macro while giving added flexibility, so it should be preferred over `@evalpoly`. `evalpoly` takes a list of coefficients as a tuple, so where one might write `@evalpoly(x, p1, p2, p3)` one would instead write `evalpoly(x, (p1, p2, p3))`.
* There is a now an `evalpoly` function meant to take the role of the `@evalpoly` macro. The function is just as efficient as the macro while giving added flexibility, so it should be preferred over `@evalpoly`. `evalpoly` takes a list of coefficients as a tuple, so where one might write `@evalpoly(x, p1, p2, p3)` one would instead write `evalpoly(x, (p1, p2, p3))` (#[32753]).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the other items, the # symbol is within the squared brackets...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, yes, the link is not working for that reason.


New library features
--------------------
Expand Down