Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make Travis build deps in parallel again #19681

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2016
Merged

Make Travis build deps in parallel again #19681

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2016

Conversation

tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

@tkelman tkelman commented Dec 22, 2016

unnecessary change from https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/19475/files#r93611089,
causes linux builds from a clean cache to time out but was not noticed when building
from an already-populated cache

(and build llvm twice, once with assertions and once without)

@tkelman tkelman force-pushed the tk/travisparallel branch 4 times, most recently from 22efce4 to 99a9f0d Compare December 22, 2016 15:35
revert unnecessary change from https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/19475/files#r93611089
which causes linux builds from a clean cache to time out (and build
llvm twice, once with assertions and once without) but was not noticed
when building from an already-populated cache
@tkelman tkelman merged commit 51b6b06 into master Dec 22, 2016
@tkelman tkelman deleted the tk/travisparallel branch December 22, 2016 19:07
@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

vtjnash commented Jan 6, 2017

It looks like this "unnecessary change" broke the macOS build (will start showing up as failing whenever the cache next fails)

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkelman commented Jan 6, 2017

in what way exactly? I have cleared the cache since this.

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkelman commented Jan 6, 2017

if you're looking at a build of an old PR, you need a rebase for travis to use the latest yml contents

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants