-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleaned up test set PR #18738
Cleaned up test set PR #18738
Conversation
b163d4b
to
86a31c8
Compare
This looks very good. I'm confused exactly what's going on with |
Docs shouldn't need much of an update, I can take a thorough look tomorrow and open a PR for it? I think |
dates/accessors allocates way more here than before merging, wonder why |
@kshyatt was it intentional to remove summary printing? I only see one call to Ref this discourse question: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/test-summary-in-julia-0-6/1461 |
IIRC the argument was that the testsets printing was to verbose for use in Base and they therefore got removed. Imo this should instead probably just be explicitly disabled by the Base test runner somehow and the default left like it used to be. |
Real problem was in this log: https://travis-ci.org/Arkoniak/MXNet.jl/jobs/191010907. Error message is on the row 2726 and "ERROR: LoadError: Some tests did not pass: 347 passed, 0 failed, 3 errored, 0 broken." is almost useless. I do not think, that +20 rows would be too verbose, but they will make search much more easier in cases like this. |
Unfortunately |
OMG, thank goodness this finally got merged! |
in september... |
@tkelman what are your thoughts?