-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve FreeBSD / generic posix support #18063
Conversation
vtjnash
commented
Aug 16, 2016
•
edited
Loading
edited
- add libuv patch
|
||
$ gmake FC=gfortran47 | ||
$ echo 'FC=gfortran6` >> Make.user |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't be a backtick
[ci skip]
@tkelman I'll leave it up to you whether you want to backport this now, or wait to see if FreeBSD users submit more patches |
@@ -84,12 +84,24 @@ static void jl_call_in_ctx(jl_ptls_t ptls, void (*fptr)(void), void *_ctx) | |||
*(void**)rsp = NULL; | |||
ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_RSP] = rsp; | |||
ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_RIP] = (uintptr_t)fptr; | |||
#elif defined(_OS_FREEBSD_) && defined(_CPU_X86_64_) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change and the other 2 sections in jl_call_in_ctx
do not backport cleanly to release-0.5 since #17727 was not backported. Okay to just not change jl_call_in_ctx
at all there?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this code doesn't exist here, there shouldn't be anything to fix