-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Manual Fixes. JuliaCon 2016 Edition #17064
Conversation
The original location of the "Elementary Function" section broke the flow between "Numerical Conversions" about round and the next section: "Rounding Functions". Additionally moved the "Elementary Function" section to be a subsection of "Numeric Comparisons".
I noticed inconsistency in how the manual refers to language. Sometimes it is referred to "Julia" and sometimes "julia". I've updated the manual (and one place in the REPL help) such that when referring to Julia is always "Julia". Also, the "Elementary Function" commit (d1cf43c) shouldn't be backported as it that is a 0.5 feature. |
The manual would sometimes refer to the language as either "Julia" or "julia". This commit changes references to the Julia language as "Julia" and any reference to the command line program as `julia`.
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ If ``io`` is not specified, ``host`` and ``port`` are used to connect. | |||
For example, a cluster manager may launch a single worker per node, and use that to launch | |||
additional workers. ``count`` with an integer value ``n`` will launch a total of ``n`` workers, | |||
while a value of ``:auto`` will launch as many workers as cores on that machine. | |||
``exename`` is the name of the julia executable including the full path. | |||
``exename`` is the name of the Julia executable including the full path. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this might be better as quoted lowercase
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking that "Julia" would refer the the language while "julia
" refers to the command-line program. Does that seem sensible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, exactly. Probably makes sense to also put julia
in backticks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. "julia executable" is pretty clearly the latter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not yet addressed here
Also prepended "see" to the references and fixed a triple space after a period.
AV restarted. @tkelman @StefanKarpinski do the latest changes here look ok? |
Feel free to merge this whenever. I have a couple more corrections to add but I can always make another PR. |
"Julia" refers to the language while "`julia`" (lowercase in backticks) specifically refers to the executable.
I've been re-reading the manual to discover any new features I may have missed over the last year. During my reading so far I've found some issues: