Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bitshift operators on Bool #16996

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2016
Merged

Fix bitshift operators on Bool #16996

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2016

Conversation

nalimilan
Copy link
Member

Previously triggered a stack overflow due to recursive definition.

Cf. #16988

@nalimilan
Copy link
Member Author

Moved to #16995 as it's needed there.

@nalimilan nalimilan closed this Jun 18, 2016
@nalimilan nalimilan deleted the nl/bitshift branch June 18, 2016 12:13
@nalimilan nalimilan restored the nl/bitshift branch June 27, 2016 08:09
@nalimilan nalimilan reopened this Jun 27, 2016
Previously triggered a stack overflow due to recursive definition.
Multiple definitions are needed to fix ambiguities and inference issues
with the generci integer method.
@nalimilan
Copy link
Member Author

Reopening since #16995 is more complex/controversial than I thought. OK to merge?

@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson merged commit f69dc41 into master Jun 27, 2016
@tkelman tkelman deleted the nl/bitshift branch June 27, 2016 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants