Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix doc bootstrap method error. #13602

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2015

Conversation

MichaelHatherly
Copy link
Member

Docstrings defined before == is available for Symbol comparisons causes a build error. Fix by comparing with ===.

Ref: #13534 (comment)

@tkelman tkelman added the docsystem The documentation building system label Oct 14, 2015
@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Oct 14, 2015

Good catch! Any easy way of testing the conditions that were breaking this?

@MichaelHatherly
Copy link
Member Author

We could add a docstring really early in the build. Since this stuff gets replaced later on by the real docsystem that's probably the only way to go.

Once #13534 is merged that would be a sufficient test, but I'll add a one to the DocBootStrap module itself until then.

Docstrings defined before `==` is available for `Symbol` comparisons
causes a build error. Fix by comparing with `===`.

Ref: JuliaLang#13534 (comment)
tkelman added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2015
@tkelman tkelman merged commit 052f900 into JuliaLang:master Oct 14, 2015
@MichaelHatherly MichaelHatherly deleted the mh/doc-bootstrap-fix branch October 15, 2015 12:21
tkelman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2015
Docstrings defined before `==` is available for `Symbol` comparisons
causes a build error. Fix by comparing with `===`.

Ref: #13534 (comment)
(cherry picked from commit d8b6a24)
ref #13602
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docsystem The documentation building system
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants