-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve sparse vcat #10206
Merged
Merged
Improve sparse vcat #10206
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than effectively converting the input arrays twice, another approach might be to break out the "stuff a single matrix into its slot" algorithm into a subfunction. That way the performance-intensive part will be type-stable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't fully understand. Input arrays that are of type
{Tv, Ti}
will anyways be no-op for convert. Worst case, most of them get converted once and then passed to vcat, which stuffs it in. How do we end up converting twice?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I shouldn't have said "convert twice," I should have said "copy twice."
To be clearer, my suggestion is:
That way, even though
x
might be type-unstable, you don't really care, because it will dispatch to a type-specialized implementation ofstuff!
, and it's that function that has all the compute-intensive operations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not really familiar with the sparse code, but I agree that @timholy is probably right. It should not be necessary to convert a complete array. By allocating the output array with the promoted type and then assigning into it, the convert should be taken care during the assignment at the level of single elements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Converting is a pretty uncommon case, which is why I thought that it was worth the simplicity to just convert. Anyways, I tried implementing
stuffcol!
(code below in comments), but that is still slower than my current implementation, and takes more memory.