-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BitArray is documented to be a DenseArray #30337
Labels
docs
This change adds or pertains to documentation
Comments
Ah, whoops, that's a documentation bug. They were indeed previously |
mbauman
changed the title
BitArray is not subtype of DenseArray
BitArray is documented to be a DenseArray
Dec 10, 2018
fredrikekre
added
the
good first issue
Indicates a good issue for first-time contributors to Julia
label
Dec 10, 2018
mbauman
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 10, 2018
Fixes #30337... and while I was there I added a bit more information about what BitArrays do and when you might run into them.
Sorry for stealing the #good-first-issue… I figured I'd clean up my own mess. |
mbauman
removed
the
good first issue
Indicates a good issue for first-time contributors to Julia
label
Dec 10, 2018
fredrikekre
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 11, 2018
Fixes #30337... and while I was there I added a bit more information about what BitArrays do and when you might run into them.
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2018
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 30, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The documentation of
BitArray
claims that it is a subtype ofDenseArray
(filebitarray.jl
) in its documentation, but the type declaration makes it only a subtype ofAbstractArray
. I don't know which is correct (probably the code...), but the inconsistency should be resolved.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: