Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

allow starting in parallel with a hostfile #290

Closed
JeffBezanson opened this issue Dec 7, 2011 · 4 comments
Closed

allow starting in parallel with a hostfile #290

JeffBezanson opened this issue Dec 7, 2011 · 4 comments
Assignees
@JeffBezanson

Comments

@JeffBezanson
Copy link
Member

Useful on clusters.
@ghost ghost assigned JeffBezanson Dec 7, 2011
JeffBezanson added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2011
@JeffBezanson
fixing issue #290, adding --machinefile option
dde9519
StefanKarpinski added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2011
@StefanKarpinski
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:JuliaLang/julia
62228f2 
* 'master' of github.com:JuliaLang/julia:
  fixing issue #290, adding --machinefile option
@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

Does this support the following syntax to start multiple processes on the same node?

beowulf1:2
beowulf2:4
beowulf3:1

@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Member

You can just include the same machine multiple times.

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

Yes, that's what I am doing now. But, this is standard syntax, and eventually we should support it.

-viral

On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:08 AM, Stefan Karpinski wrote:

You can just include the same machine multiple times.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#290 (comment)

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

This syntax comes in handy in setting up process topologies when you have more efficient communication mechanisms on the same node. For now, repeating is good enough.

-viral

On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:08 AM, Stefan Karpinski wrote:

You can just include the same machine multiple times.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#290 (comment)

StefanKarpinski pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2018
@yuyichao @stevengj
A few fixes for 0.6 (#290)
3541c2d 
* `num` and `den` rename
* `takebuf_array` rename
* Fix `$` in the test
Keno pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2023
@timholy
Make parametric_type_to_expr recursive (fixes #285) (#290)
0f16364 
We also avoid compiling methods for ccalls that use parametric types
that we can't resolve due to module scope issues.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@StefanKarpinski @ViralBShah @JeffBezanson