Initialize the union selector of undefined upsilon nodes

While we're guaranteed never to look at undefined values,
we're not guaranteed that the type information can't change, which
in the case of a union generates code to change the layout.
As a result, we need to make sure to have the union selectors
be valid (the actual data will be junk and no semantic operation
will ever look at it, but it shouldn't be ouf of bounds).

Ref #29152

src/codegen.cpp

@@ -6184,10 +6184,18 @@ static std::unique_ptr<Module> emit_function(
             // If the val is null, we can ignore the store.
             // The middle end guarantees that the value from this
             // upsilon node is not dynamically observed.
+            jl_varinfo_t &vi = ctx.phic_slots[upsilon_to_phic[cursor+1]];
             if (val) {
                 jl_cgval_t rval_info = emit_expr(ctx, val);
-                jl_varinfo_t &vi = ctx.phic_slots[upsilon_to_phic[cursor+1]];
                 emit_varinfo_assign(ctx, vi, rval_info);
+            } else if (vi.pTIndex) {
+                // We don't care what the contents of the variable are, but it
+                // does need to satisfy the union invariants (i.e. inbounds
+                // tindex).
+                ctx.builder.CreateStore(
+                    vi.boxroot ? ConstantInt::get(T_int8, 0x80) :
+                                 ConstantInt::get(T_int8, 0x01),
+                    vi.pTIndex, true);
             }
             find_next_stmt(cursor + 1);
             continue;

test/core.jl

@@ -6794,3 +6794,14 @@ let a = [1,2,3,4,missing,6,7]
     foo(x) = x > 0 ? x : missing
     @test_throws TypeError foo(missing)
 end
+
+# issue #29152
+function f29152()
+    try
+        g29152()
+    finally
+    end
+end
+g29152() = (_true29152 ? error() : _true29152 ? 0 : false)
+_true29152 = true;
+@test_throws ErrorException f29152()