-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Commit
- Loading branch information
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ | |
/file_constants.jl | ||
/uv_constants.jl | ||
/version_git.jl | ||
/userimg.jl |
5 comments
on commit 78e34eb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a version of this locally too; one thing I've noticed is that (currently at least, and maybe long-term) we would benefit from a make bare
to build a version of Julia that doesn't include userimg.jl
. This is not something I currently know how to implement, but perhaps it could just temporarily rename userimg.jl
and then change it back after the build is done?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm. That's a pretty hacky way to do this. I'm hoping that we can have a better, more general and robust system for preloading things soon. For now I think this will have to do. Was your version significantly different? It was actually rather hard to figure out something here that worked at all. This bootstrapping stuff is so fragile.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than me not realizing that base/
has its own .gitignore
, it was identical.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
make bare
is easy; just export JULIA_MAKE_BARE=1
in the makefile shell, then inside Julia's sysimg.jl
file put get( ENV, "JULIA_MAKE_BARE", "") != "1"
or similar in an if statement around these include
functions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
......wow, just realized that this is really old. I guess Keno's comments above tricked my brain into thinking that this was something being actively discussed. Ignore me! :P
I believe this needs to be Core.include to avoid #6657