-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Document and clean up CodegenParams (#51140)
- Add documentation to CodegenParams fields per request in #51123 - Fix compare_cgparams which hadn't been updated for recent additions - Remove unused and untested generic_context The latter was a codegen option that I added, but eventually ended up not using anywhere, so remove it for the time being. That said, I may end up in a situation where I need it again in the very near future, so I may end up eating my words here, but if I need to put it back, I'll include a test at least ;).
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
77 additions
and
20 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
6c1168a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Executing the daily package evaluation, I will reply here when finished:
@nanosoldier
runtests(isdaily = true)
6c1168a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The package evaluation job you requested has completed - possible new issues were detected.
The full report is available.
6c1168a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nanosoldier
runbenchmarks(ALL, isdaily = true)
6c1168a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here.
6c1168a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like some good inference improvement (maybe #51092?), and maybe also skipmissing is a bit faster too, but also seems like that might be noise, since I am not sure why that should be any faster