-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Revert "Fix miscellaneous type instabilities"
- Loading branch information
1 parent
8f99882
commit 6bcb99c
Showing
6 changed files
with
32 additions
and
16 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
6bcb99c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nanosoldier
runbenchmarks(ALL, vs = ":master")
6bcb99c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm Nanosoldier didn't seem to pick this one up. You didn't edit in quotes to your comment or something like that did you? Nanosoldier doesn't pick up on comment edits anymore. Let's try again:
@nanosoldier
runbenchmarks(ALL, vs = ":master")
EDIT: Turns out one of the server nodes fell over and I had to reboot. I resubmitted the job and it's running now.
6bcb99c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I wrote it wrong first but instead of editing I deleted and made a new comment. Thanks for fixing it.
6bcb99c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here. cc @jrevels
6bcb99c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
["simd",("conditional_loop!","Int32",4095)]
["simd",("conditional_loop!","Int32",4096)]
woah, is there really a >100x improvement here or did something go wonky?
6bcb99c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Those improvements should be real: The regressions were ~250x if memory serves.
6bcb99c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, there are some inlining bugs with function return type syntax so I guess these isn't getting inlined anymore.
6bcb99c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm going to delete this branch for the sake of cleanliness, but leave a cross-reference to #17530 so it's possible to find the conversation from there later