Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand usage section in README to mention backports #772

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 23, 2022

Conversation

martinholters
Copy link
Member

@martinholters martinholters requested a review from KristofferC May 18, 2022 08:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 18, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #772 (25a680f) into master (4e631e6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #772   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.35%   88.35%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         146      146           
=======================================
  Hits          129      129           
  Misses         17       17           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4e631e6...25a680f. Read the comment docs.

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Milan Bouchet-Valat <[email protected]>
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nalimilan nalimilan changed the title Expand usage section in REAMDE to mention backports Expand usage section in README to mention backports May 22, 2022
@martinholters martinholters merged commit 42baeea into master May 23, 2022
@martinholters martinholters deleted the mh/mention-backports-in-readme branch May 23, 2022 06:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants