You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So only support Julia 1.6+ from 0.28 onwards. Curious to know if there are any objections.
We don't really need <= 1.5 support for Julia docs themselves. For packages, you don't need to be able to run Documenter with every supported Julia version, and you can just build docs with Julia 1.6+. On the other hand, it would allow us to use JLLs etc. freely here (e.g. for Git, which is what prompted this).
If anyone really has a package that is only being run on Julia <= 1.5 (maybe privately), then they can still keep using the 0.27 branch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No objections. No one should be using 1.1--1.5. They should either be using 1.0 or 1.6, and since 1.6 is now the LTS, they should move from 1.0 to 1.6 which is a non-breaking change. Even then, they can keep using 1.0 and Documenter 0.27, so there's no harm.
JuMP dropped <1.6 support when we release 1.0 and there hasn't been any issues. It really simplified our binary dependency story.
So only support Julia 1.6+ from 0.28 onwards. Curious to know if there are any objections.
We don't really need <= 1.5 support for Julia docs themselves. For packages, you don't need to be able to run Documenter with every supported Julia version, and you can just build docs with Julia 1.6+. On the other hand, it would allow us to use JLLs etc. freely here (e.g. for Git, which is what prompted this).
If anyone really has a package that is only being run on Julia <= 1.5 (maybe privately), then they can still keep using the 0.27 branch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: