Upgrade to SpecialFunctions 0.8 #39
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In version 0.8 of
SpecialFunctionslgammawas split intologgammaandlogabsgammawhere the latter returns a tuple of the value and the sign. Similarly changes were made forlbeta. The oldlgammaandlbetaused to return just the log of the absolute value of the argument which often was forgotten. That was also the case for the definitions here inDiffRulesbut luckily that means that the definitions become correct when we changelgammatologgammaandlbetatologbetaas this PR does. I plan to release version 0.1 once this PR has been merged since there are downstream packages waiting for this.