Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make rrule return identical pullback for zero as for one #797

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

make rrule return identical pullback for zero as for one #797

merged 5 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

nsajko
Copy link
Contributor

@nsajko nsajko commented May 30, 2024

Could be a minor compilation latency and/or type stability win for some uses.

nsajko added 3 commits May 30, 2024 16:00
Could be a minor compilation latency and/or type stability win for some
uses.
@nsajko
Copy link
Contributor Author

nsajko commented May 30, 2024

The test failures seem unrelated, though serious.

Project.toml Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
name = "ChainRules"
uuid = "082447d4-558c-5d27-93f4-14fc19e9eca2"
version = "1.66.0"
version = "1.66.1"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this isn't a bug fix, so should be

Suggested change
version = "1.66.1"
version = "1.67.0"

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member

oxinabox commented May 31, 2024

I am not sure this is worth the complexity.
I think it would be fine if it didn't introduce the constant,
and just put in the Returns.
Then it is self=explainitory.

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member

the 1.6 x86 thing is a transient failure that has been shopwing up on and off

@oxinabox oxinabox merged commit 9dd39bd into JuliaDiff:main May 31, 2024
8 of 11 checks passed
@nsajko nsajko deleted the zero_one_identically_same_pullback branch May 31, 2024 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants