Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README for Julia 1.0 #98

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update README for Julia 1.0 #98

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nalimilan
Copy link
Member

Fixes #97.

We could also add deprecations for remaining functions, but probably better do that for all functions at the same time once replacements have been included in Julia (notably nonmissingtype and passmissing).

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 24, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #98 into master will increase coverage by 3.53%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #98      +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   88.46%   92%   +3.53%     
=======================================
  Files           1     1              
  Lines          52    50       -2     
=======================================
  Hits           46    46              
+ Misses          6     4       -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Missings.jl 92% <0%> (+3.53%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3ac53e9...a20df09. Read the comment docs.

This package still provides additional features to handle `missing` values.
See [the Julia manual](https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/missing/index.html) for general documentation on missing values in Julia.
This package still provides additional features to handle `missing` values:
- `Missings.T` to extract `T` from a `Union{T, Missing}` type
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth mentioning this at all given that Base.nonmissingtype exists?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Until it's exported I'd rather not recommend it. Also it's broken in complex cases in older Julia versions.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's fair I suppose.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- `Missings.T` to extract `T` from a `Union{T, Missing}` type
- `Missings.nonmissingtype` to extract `T` from a `Union{T, Missing}` type

@nalimilan nalimilan closed this Sep 1, 2019
@nalimilan nalimilan deleted the nl/README branch September 1, 2019 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

skipping missing values
4 participants