-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
updates for v1.5, etc. #289
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d351511
travis: fix for Coveralls API error in test
vtjnash 72a6b90
Coveralls: parallel variable is not necessary
vtjnash 0f7dc8b
tests: fixes for Julia v1.5
vtjnash ea58eb3
codecovio code efficiency improvements
vtjnash d8c1a6e
Coveralls: synchronize variable usages with node-coveralls from npm
vtjnash 1e5a203
win,Coveralls: normalize file path separators when submitting
vtjnash 393a95e
remove tests for functionality not implemented here anymore
vtjnash 5169eeb
travis: reduce build matrix
vtjnash File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am surprised this is not necessary anymore. They still mention it on https://github.com/marketplace/actions/coveralls-github-action and https://docs.coveralls.io/parallel-build-webhook, and it was absolutely vital when I last played with it -- but that was some time ago; so if that's what you found empirically, let's do it... Coveralls documentation sucks in general, so I am not completely surprised it might not reflect reality anymore :-).
I'll soon need to dig into this again for another project (where Travis cut our legs, so we moved to GitHub Actions, and that broke Coveralls integration), I'll keep this in mind, might simplify things there!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I noticed that even old builds now are showing up correctly without this flag. But the only effect it was now having here was to prevent any builds from showing up (it was unable to process the webhook now, I'm guessing perhaps due to the deprecation of travis-ci.org)
lemurheavy/coveralls-public#1461 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vtjnash looking at e.g. #288 there are now four coveralls comments there. I vaguely recall from way back that this was caused by the "parallel" support not being activated -- but it's been some time, so I might totally misremember!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It used to be disabled entirely, but I'm not sure why it'd be 4 and not 8 (the number of builds) or 1 (the top comment has 5 rolling edits as the parallel builds finished)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Top comment was created, then edited 5 times; plus 3 more comments; means a total of 1+5+3=9 results reported. The Travis build has 9 jobs. So what I think happens is that whenever one of the jobs ends, Coveralls adds or updates an issue comment. Why it didn't just put all updates in one comment, I can only guess at; most likely a race condition, but w/o being able to see the precise timestamps when each comment was made/updated, it's hard to say...