-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Duplicated files in Coveralls #245
Comments
This is an issue with the Coveralls.io service, not with the The Coveralls.io service does not understand how to correctly merge multiple coverage reports for the same source code file. Therefore, if you go to your Coveralls.io dashboard, you see multiple duplicates of the same source file. In contrast, the Codecov.io service correctly merges reports (https://docs.codecov.io/docs/merging-reports), and it does so automatically. Therefore, if you go to your Codecov.io dashboard, you will not see these duplicates. The issue is with Coveralls.io, and unfortunately they need to be the ones to fix it. If this is a problem for you, I'd recommend only using Codecov.io and not even bothering with Coveralls.io |
I happened to be browsing the Coveralls.io docs, and found that it describes how to support this, it's just not automatic like codecov.io. We need to send |
That seems very doable.
That seems much harder. How would Coverage.jl know all of the CI runs are completed? |
Ah, based off of the link you posted, I see what you mean. You have to set up the post-build webhook with the CI provider. But what if you have two or more CI providers (e.g. Travis and AppVeyor) and you want to combine all the reports. Do you have to set up post-build webhooks on all of the CI providers? Does Coveralls understand that there are multiple CI providers? |
Per documentation at https://docs.coveralls.io/parallel-build-webhook fixes #245
Hi!
All my files are repeated 6 times in Coveralls analysis: https://coveralls.io/github/JuliaSpace/SatelliteToolbox.jl?branch=master. This does not happen with Coverage. I think this must be related to the fact that I was testing against 6 Julia versions. Is it expected?
I am using Coverage analysis by the native support in Travis:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: