Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare SparseFEM benchmark to changes to find() on Julia master #157

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2018

Conversation

nalimilan
Copy link
Collaborator

find will soon return cartesian indices (JuliaLang/julia#24774), so this benchmark needs to convert them to linear indices. Unfortunately, LinearIndices currently does not allow indexing with an array, so we need to use map.

@nalimilan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Julia 0.6 needs JuliaLang/Compat.jl#446 to work.

@nalimilan nalimilan closed this Jan 9, 2018
@nalimilan nalimilan reopened this Jan 9, 2018
@ararslan
Copy link
Member

ararslan commented Jan 9, 2018

Can you bump the Compat version in REQUIRE to 0.44.0?

find() will soon return cartesian indices, so this benchmark needs
to convert them to linear indices. Unfortunately, LinearIndice
currently does not allow indexing with an array, so we need to use
a comprehension.
@nalimilan nalimilan closed this Jan 9, 2018
@nalimilan nalimilan reopened this Jan 9, 2018
@nalimilan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ararslan Thanks! Can you merge? Doesn't look like I have the needed rights.

@ararslan
Copy link
Member

ararslan commented Jan 9, 2018

Yep, I was waiting for CI to finish, but it turns out I just needed to refresh the page. :)

I'll retune the benchmarks then trigger Nanosoldier on your PR.

@ararslan ararslan merged commit 3ae227e into JuliaCI:master Jan 9, 2018
@nalimilan nalimilan deleted the nl/linearindices branch January 9, 2018 22:02
Keno pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants